Make Better Decisions by Thinking Like a Computer Professor Ramos Blog

Make Better Decisions by Thinking Like a Computer   Tom Griffiths is a Psychologist Cognitive scientist who is exploring connections between artificial and natural intelligence to discover how people solve challenging problems. First Griffiths Explains how you can use thirty seven percent to make better choices in your life . He brings up the moment of buying a home which can be a very stressful time. If you look at thirty seven percent of homes that are on the market he suggest you should buy the next home that is better than any of the other house you have preciously looked at. this will maximize your probability   that you will find the best place. Second he teaches us about Explore or Exploit which is trying something new or going with something that you all ready know will be good. Griffith tells us its like choosing where to eat. Do you go some where you have never been or do you go to your usual spot. He wants us to look at the time that we will be spend in that area. If we are going to stay a while we may try something new s o that we can gather information. But if we are just there for the day we want to exploit by just eating somewhere we are familiar with. Third is Last Accessed, take   a filing box for example and when you use a file you need to put it back in the box on the left side. this makes it earlier for you to find things that you use more often because they will be on the left side. Now he compares our brain to a   computer,it takes information   and stores it. But what happens when its full? It has to delete   information that is not being used. The last accessed information is what is deleted, just like the saying if you dont use it you lose it.   so the files on the right side of your box are going to be you last accessed which will be tossed out first. Q1. Do you think that these 3 tool can help you in real life ? yes or no and why? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mLQFm3wEfw   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚   Photo by rawpixel.com on Pexels.com

Bullying Case Study Analysis through the Major Psychology Studies

Bullying Case Study Analysis through the Major Psychology Studies Bullying Case Study Analysis through the Major Psychology Studies Once upon a time, there was a girl named Sarah who went to school with children, studied in the university with other students or worked in an office with white collars. In fact, that doesn’t matter who, how old, and where she was. The thing is that she was kinda different, no matter how, maybe she was a bit taciturn, or liked a special type of food, or followed a separate religion, and because of that, Sarah often got picked on. Just because she was not like everyone else. Loads of people have been in Sarah’s shoes and got bullied because of the race, religion, social, gender or national differences, and, the chances are that they consider bullies the real villains. In some measure, that is the truth because every person has a choice. However, we would like you to have a look at the issue from a different perspective – the share of social impact on the bullying phenomenon. Stanford Prison Experiment Let’s consider any bullying case study in terms of the most popular psychological studies, and Stanford Prison Experiment is one of them. Regular students were placed in jail and were given roles: prisoners and guards. After some time, they got into the characters so much that guards assaulted prisoners psychologically and physically without any hints from the research team, and â€Å"convicts† accepted the abuse like normal behavior. After 6 days, the experiment was stopped. The result of the experiment stated that the reasons for such course of actions were not certain personalities of the participants or predisposition for violence, but the situation and environment were put in. Sounds familiar? The Third Wave Studying fascism in one of California high schools, students couldn’t understand how German people could have accepted the Nazi regime. In fact, they claimed that they would never join the movement willingly. To prove them wrong, the history teacher promoted some concepts mimicking certain peculiar features of the Nazi regime. After 5 days, the movement following these concepts got out of control, and the teacher gathered a meeting explaining what happened. Bullying appears as a result of stereotypes and standards set too high. The society itself produces bullies who pick on people refusing to follow the â€Å"correct† and approved by the majority rules. Asch Conformity Experiments Solomon Asch studied the phenomenon of people following the crowd. His most famous experiments consisted of placing real participants with fake ones. The real subjects of the studies had to give correct answers to different questions, but only after the fake ones had responded first (opting for a wrong variant). During the first sessions, participants answered correctly, but after some rounds, they followed the crowd and chose wrong variants. As you can see, these experiments prove the social nature of bullying. We don’t protect bullies by any means. We’re just saying that before blaming them for all the evil in the world, you should address bigger issues and raise people’s awareness about something like fakely set social standards if you really want to change the situation. Be smarter than those who follow the crowd. At service, we can provide you with case study analysis help from reliable writers.